A92138:897
The divine right of church-government and excommunication
The divine right of church-government and excommunication: or a peaceable dispute for the perfection of the holy scripture in point of ceremonies and church government; in which the removal of the Service-book is justified, the six books of Tho: Erastus against excommunication are briefly examined; with a vindication of that eminent divine Theod: Beza against the aspersions of Erastus, the arguments of Mr. William Pryn, Rich: Hooker, Dr. Morton, Dr. Jackson, Dr. John Forbes, and the doctors of Aberdeen; touching will-worship, ceremonies, imagery, idolatry, things indifferent, an ambulatory government; the due and just powers of the magistrate in matters of religion, and the arguments of Mr. Pryn, in so far as they side with Erastus, are modestly discussed. To which is added, a brief tractate of scandal ... / By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Published by authority.The divine right of church-government and excommunication: or a peacable dispute for the perfection of the holy scripture in point of ceremonies and church government; in which the removal of the Service-book is justifi'd, the six books of Tho: Erastus against excommunication are briefly examin'd; with a vindication of that eminent divine Theod: Beza against the aspersions of Erastus, the arguments of Mr. William Pryn, Rich: Hooker, Dr. Morton, Dr. Jackson, Dr. John Forbes, and the doctors of Aberdeen; touching will-worship, ceremonies, imagery, idolatry, things indifferent, an ambulatory government; the due and just powers of the magistrate in matters of religion, and the arguments of Mr. Pryn, in so far as they side with Erastus, are modestly discussed. To which is added, a brief tractate of scandal ... / By Samuel Rutherfurd, Professor of Divinity in the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. Published by authority.
London: printed by John Field for Christopher Meredith, 1646
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Erastus. It is unpossible that the word [Greek or Hebrew] destruction, can be1 shown to signify the destruction of the desires of sinful flesh in all the New-Testament, it always signifieth killing, death, destruction; nor doth the thing it self compel us to take it other ways here, nor for killing and death, as 1 Thes. 5. It is true [Greek or Hebrew] Rom. 8. [Greek or Hebrew] to kill, destroy, crucify, are so taken, but never [Greek or Hebrew] or [Greek or Hebrew] in either sacred or profane Authors.
Erastus. It is unpossible that the word 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 destruction, can be1 shown to signifie the destruction of the desires of sinfull flesh in all the New-Testament, it alwayes signifieth killing, death, destruction; nor doth the thing it self compell us to take it other wayes here, nor for killing and death, as 1 Thes. 5. It is true 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 Rom. 8. 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 to kill, destroy, crucifie, are so taken, but never 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 or 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 in either sacred or prophane Authors.
- 1Pag. 218. The destruction of the flesh.