A92140:718
A free disputation against pretended liberty of conscience tending to resolve doubts moved
A free disputation against pretended liberty of conscience tending to resolve doubts moved by Mr. John Goodwin, John Baptist, Dr. Jer. Taylor, the Belgic Arminians, Socinians, and other authors contending for lawless liberty, or licentious toleration of sects and heresies. / By Samuel Rutherfurd professor of divinity in the University of St. Andrews.A free disputation against pretended liberty of conscience tending to resolve doubts moved by Mr. John Goodwin, John Baptist, Dr. Jer. Taylor, the Belgick Arminians, Socinians, and other authors contending for lawlesse liberty, or licentious toleration of sects and heresies. / By Samuel Rutherfurd professor of divinity in the University of St. Andrews.
London: printed by R.I. for Andrew Crook, 1649
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Aquinas saith,1 by way of divine determination. But the truth is, the proposition might have some ground in the Law of nature, but why 39. stripes, not, 40. not 38. only should be inflicted on such an evil doer, and the assumption in many judicial Laws▪ 2seem to be an act of the mere positive will of God,3 therefore Aquinas saith, Ceremonials primo & per••se, first and chiefly were ordained to signify things, but Judicials secondary did signify things to come. And Swarez saith, That judicials necessarily, and by accident, did signify things. It is true, Cori•thus, […] and Jerome saith,4 and the Ebionites, as Irenaeus saith, and the Nazarer, as Augustine tells us, hold that Ceremonials and Judicials do yet oblige. Schoolmen deny their obligation ⟨p. 300⟩as Soto, 5Aquinas, Medina, Valentia, Gamacheus, because the Priesthood is changed.
Aquinas saith,1 by way of divine determination. But the truth is, the proposition might have some ground in the Law of nature, but why 39. stripes, not, 40. not 38. only should be inflicted on such an evill doer, and the assumption in many judiciall Lawes▪ 2seeme to be an act of the meere positive will of God,3 therefore Aquinas saith, Ceremonials primo & per••se, first and chiefly were ordained to signifie things, but Iudicials secundarie did signifie things to come. And Swarez saith, That judiials aecessarily, and by accident, did signifie things. It is true, Corithus, and erome saith,