A01540:292
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I. B. The Proposition he confirmeth: First, touching a thing lawful in it self, by showing that Act to be lawful in it self, which in Gods word is either commanded or permitted expressly, or by just consequence.
I. B. The Proposition he confirmeth: First, touching a thing lawfull in it selfe, by shewing that Act to be lawfull in it selfe, which in Gods word is either commanded or permitted expresly, or by iust consequence.
T. G. This is an explication indeed of one term used in it: no confirmation of the Proposition, nor so propounded.
T. G. This is an explication indeed of one terme vsed in it: no confirmation of the Proposition, nor so propounded.
I. B. Secondly, touching the manner, &c. by proving the rest of the Proposition, which he endeavoureth to perform, 1. By the authority of Calvin. 2. By Luk. 9. 50. 3. By a gloss. 4. By showing that the circumstance of time for free-will offerings being not determined, they might have been offered at any time; and Sacrifices: might have ⟨p. 117⟩been in any place before a certain place was determined.
I. B. Secondly, touching the manner, &c. by prouing the rest of the Proposition, which he endeuoureth to performe, 1. By the authoritie of Caluin. 2. By Luk. 9. 50. 3. By a glosse. 4. By shewing that the circumstance of time for free-will offerings being not determined, they might haue beene offered at any time; and Sacrifices: might haue