A01540:305
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and…
A just defence of certain passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and use of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have been made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiency of his answers given to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecility of his arguments produced against the same further discovered; and the point it self in controversy more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.A iust defence of certaine passages in a former treatise concerning the nature and vse of lots, against such exceptions and oppositions as have beene made thereunto to Mr. I.B. Wherein the insufficiencie of his answers giuen to the arguments brought in defence of a lusorious lot is manifested; the imbecillitie of his arguments produced against the same further discouered; and the point it selfe in controuersie more fully cleared; by Thomas Gataker B. of D. and author of the former treatise.
London: printed by John Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623London: printed by Iohn Haviland for Robert Bird, 1623
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
T. G. This then, it seemeth, is one point of that fearful shifting that Mr. B. chargeth me with. Concerning which enough hath already been said; for this is no new exception. And though the words be not thus generally propounded in my Proposition, as Mr. B. himself propoundeth it: Yet there is no contradiction between these two: since that gWhatsoever is not forbidden in Gods word, is by the same word warranted. What proofs he dreameth of shall hereafter appear.
T. G. This then, it seemeth, is one point of that fearefull shifting that Mr. B. chargeth me with. Concerning which enough hath already beene said; for this is no new exception. And though the words be not thus generally propounded in my Proposition, as Mr. B. himselfe propoundeth it: Yet there is no contradiction betweene these two: since that gWhatsoeuer is not forbidden in Gods word, is by the same word warranted. What proofes he dreameth of shall hereafter appeare.
- gOmnia licent, i. omnis omnium creaturarum & rerum usus lege D•i non prohibitu•, licitè & si•e peccato h•beri p•test. Mor•on in 1 Cor. 6 12. quarumvis creaturarū & rerum usus lege mor•li non prohibitus l•e, •. sive peccato […] po•. s•. Ide in 1 Cor. 10. 23.Omnia licent, i. omnis omnium creaturarum & rerum usus lege D•i non prohibitu, licitè & sie peccato hberi ptest. Moron in