Here M. Harding maketh much ado about Consecration: and yet are not his Fellows well agreed, what to make of their own Consecration. Gabriel saith, 1Chritus potuit sine verbo tanquam verus Deus, Substantiam Panis, & Vini Consecrare: Vel, potuit verba quaedam secretò proferre, & per illa Consecrare: Vel, per haec Verba, Hoc est Corpus meum, Consecrare potuit: Vel, potuit priùs Consecrare, & posteà distribuere: Vel, primùm distribuere, & posteà Consecrare. Quid autem horum fecerit, ex Sacris Scripturis non constat: Christe, as being very God, might Consecrate the Substance of Bread and Wine without word: Or else, he might speak certain words in secrete, and by them Consecrate: Or else, he might Consecrate by these words, This is my Body: Or else, he might first Consecrate, and after deliver: Or else, first deliver, and after Consecrate. But which of all these he did in deed,2 by the Holy Scriptures it appeareth not. Cardinal Bessarion saith, that in the Latin Church Consecration is wrought by the words of Christ: in the Greek Church by other Prayers, that follow afterward. Catharinus entreating purposely hereof, saith, Christ Consecrated not with the same words, that are now used in the Mass, This is my Body. Durandus saith, Christ Consecrated by his Divine power, and after Consecration said, This is my Body. Petrus Alliacensis yieldeth this reason hereof, Quia, nisi antè fuisset Corpus Christi, Christus non verè dixisset, Hoc est Corpus meum: If it had not been Christs Body before, Christ could not have said truly, This is my Body. It is concluded in a Book called Antididagma. lately set forth by the Chapter of Cologne. that the bare words of Christs Institution, without the words of the Canon of the Mass, are not sufficient to work Consecration. Bonaventura saith, To have the true Form of Consecration, we must seek, not to the Gospel of Christ, but to the Canon. Howe be it, thereof groweth a great inconvenience, that Christ, and his Apostles, for that they had not the words of the Canon, had therefore no Consecration. Again Bonaventura saith, that these words, Novi, & Aeterni Testamenti, are not of the substance of Consecration: but are used only as a furniture. 3Johannes Scotus saithe, Quod ergo est consilium?
Here M. Hardinge maketh mutche adoo about Consecration: and yet are not his Felowes wel agreed, what to make of theire owne Consecration. Gabriel saithe, 1Chritus potuit sine verbo tanquam verus Deus, Substantiam Panis, & Vini Consecrare: Vel, potuit verba quaedam secretò proferre, & per illa Consecrare: Vel, per haec Verba, Hoc est Corpus meum, Consecrare potuit: Vel, potuit priùs Consecrare, & posteà distribuere: Vel, primùm distribuere, & posteà Consecrare. Quid autem horum fecerit, ex Sacris Scripturis non constat: Christe, as beinge very God, might Consecrate the Substance of Breade and VVine vvithout vvoorde: Or els, he might speake certaine wordes in secrete, and by them Consecrate: Or els, he might Consecrate by these woordes, This is my Body: Or els, he might firste Consecrate, and after deliuer: Or els, firste deliuer, and after Consecrate. But vvhiche of al these he did in deede,2 by the Holy Scriptures it appeareth not. Cardinal Bessarion saithe, that in the Latine Churche Consecration is wrought by the vvoordes of Christe: in the Gréeke Churche by other Praiers, that folowe afterwarde. Catharinus intreatinge pourposely hereof, saithe, Christe Consecrated not vvith the same vvordes, that are nowe vsed in the Masse, This is my Body. Durandus saithe, Christe Consecrated by his Diuine povver, and after Consecration saide, This is my Body. Petrus Alliacensis yeldeth this reason hereof, Quia, nisi antè fuisset Corpus Christi, Christus non verè dixisset, Hoc est Corpus meum: If it had not benne Christes Body before, Christe coulde not haue said truely, This is my Body. It is concluded in a Booke called Antididagma. lately set foorth by the Chapter of Colaine. that the bare woordes of Christes Institution, without the woordes of the Canon of the Masse, are not sufficient to woorke Consecration. Bonauentura saithe, To haue the true Fourme of Consecration, wée muste séeke, not to the Gospel of Christe, but to the Canon. Howe be it, thereof groweth a greate inconuenience, that Christe, and his Apostles, for that they had not the woordes of the Canon, had therefore no Consecration. Againe Bonauentura saithe, that these woordes, Noui, & Aeterni Testamenti, are not of the substance of Consecration: but are vsed onely as a fourniture. 3Iohannes Scotus saithe, Quod ergo est consilium?
- 1Gabriel Biel. Lectio. 36.
- 2Bessarion de Sacramen. Eucharistia. Catharinus De Consecratione. Durandus Li. 4. De Sexta parte Canonis. Petrus de Alliaco, in. 4. Senten. quae. 5. Antididagma. Bonaventura in 4 Senten. dist. 8. quae. 2.Bessarion de Sacramen. Eucharistia. Catharinus De Consecratione. Durandus Li. 4. De Sexta parte Canonis. Petrus de Alliaco, in. 4. Senten. quae. 5. Antididagma. Bonauentura in 4 Senten. dist. 8. quae. 2.
- 3Scotus in. 4. Senten. dis. 8. quae. 2.
