A04474:2916
A reply unto M. Hardinges answerA replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare
A reply unto M. Hardinges answer by perusing whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weak, and unstable grounds of the Romaine religion, which of late hath been accounted Catholic. By John Jewel Bishop of Salisbury.A replie vnto M. Hardinges ansvveare by perusinge whereof the discrete, and diligent reader may easily see, the weake, and vnstable groundes of the Romaine religion, whiche of late hath beene accompted Catholique. By Iohn Iewel Bishoppe of Sarisburie.
Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the sign of the Black Oliphant, by Henry Wykes, Anno. 1565Imprinted at London : In Fleetestreate, at the signe of the Blacke Oliphante, by Henry VVykes, Anno. 1565
Article 12 › M. Harding. The .16. Division.Article 12 › M. Hardinge. The .16. Diuision.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
M. Harding. The .16. Division.
M. Hardinge. The .16. Diuision.
Again,1 S. Augustine saith in an other place: Non hoc Corpus, quod videtis, comesturi estis. Not this Body, which ye see, shall ye eat.* And S. Hierome saith, Divinam & Spiritualem Carnem manducandam dari, aliam quidem ab ea quae Crucifixa est, That Divine, and Spiritual Flesh is given to be eaten, other beside that, which was Crucified. Wherefore in respect of the exhibiting, the Flesh is divided, that in it self is but one: and the Flesh exhibited in mystery, is in very deed a Sacrament of Christs Body visible, and palpable, which suffered on the Cross. And thus it followeth of convenience, where as the Flesh is not the same according to the qualities of the exhibiting, which was Crucified, and which now is sacrificed by the hands of a Priest: again, where as the Passion, Death, and Resurrection are said to be done, not in trueth of the thing, but in mystery Signifying: it followeth (I say) that the Flesh is not the same in qualities, so as it was on the Cross, though it be the same in substance.
Againe,1 S. Augustine saith in an other place: Non hoc Corpus, quod videtis, comesturi estis. Not this Bodie, whiche ye see, shal ye eate.* And S. Hierome saith, Diuinam & Spiritualem Carnem manducandam dari, aliam quidem ab ea quae Crucifixa est, That Diuine, and Spiritual Fleashe is geuen to be eaten, other beside that, whiche was Crucified. VVherefore in respecte of the exhibitinge, the Fleashe is diuided, that in it selfe is but one: and the Fleashe exhibited in mysterie, is in very deede a Sacrament of Christes Bodie visible, and palpable, whiche suffered on the Crosse. And thus it foloweth of conuenience, where as the Fleashe is not the same accordinge to the qualities of the exhibitinge, whiche was Crucified, and whiche nowe is sacrificed by the handes of a Prieste: againe, where as the Passion, Death, and Resurrection are saide to be done, not in trueth of the thinge, but in mysterie Signifieinge: it foloweth (I saie) that the Fleashe is not the same in qualities, so as it was on the Crosse, though it be the same in substance.