A14212:346
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zechariah…A collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary…
A collection of certain learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinity in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laid down by that author in his catechism. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newly translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoof of our Christian country-manA collection of certaine learned discourses, written by that famous man of memory Zachary Ursine; doctor and professor of divinitie in the noble and flourishing schools of Neustad. For explication of divers difficult points, laide downe by that author in his catechisme. Lately put in print in Latin by the last labour of D. David Parry: and now newlie translated into English, by I.H. for the benefit and behoofe of our Christian country-man
Oxford: printed by Joseph Barnes, 1600Oxford: printed by Ioseph Barnes, 1600
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But the breaking of the bread is improperly and mystically the breaking of the body of Christ. For the breaking of the body is the crucifying there of.
But the breaking of the bread is improperly and mysticallie the breaking of the bodie of Christ. For the breaking of the body is the crucifying ther of.
Therefore the bread broken is in a mystical sense the body broken.
Th•refore the bread brokē is in a mystical sence the bodie broken.
Arg. 2. The second argument is drawn from the author Christ himself, which is true.
Arg. 2. The second argument is drawne from the author Christ himselfe, which is true.
Ans. This argument takes that for a ground which is in controversy: for they must prove that Christ said his body was in, under, or with the bread. Nay one may speak figuratively, & yet plainly to. Reply. 1. He is omnipotent. Ergo he can be every where, yea even in the bread.