A18078:186
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to…A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to…
A reply to an answer made of M. Doctor Whitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.A replye to an ansvvere made of M. Doctor VVhitgifte Against the admonition to the Parliament. By T.C.
printed by John Stroud?, 1573
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
I will not enter now / to discus / whether it were well done to fast in all places according to the custom of the place. You oppose Amb. & Aug. I could oppose 1Ignatius and Tertullian / whereof the one saith it is (nefas) a detestable thing to fast upon the Lords day / the other / ye it is to kill the Lord / & this is the inconvenience that cometh of such unlearned kind of reasoning / S. Ambrose saith so / & therefore it is true. And although Amb. and Aug. being strangers and private men at Rome would have so done / yet it followeth not / that if they had ben citizens & ministers there y• they would have don it / & if they had don so to / yet it followeth not but they would have spoken against the appointment of days / & nomothesian, of 2fasting / whereof Eusebius saith / that Montanus was the first author. I speak of that which they ought to have done / for otherwise I know they both thought corruptly of fasting: when as the one saith / it was remedy or reward to fast other days / but in Lent / not to fast / was sin: and the other asketh / what salvation we can obtain / if we blot not our sins by fasting / seeing that the scripture saith / ye fasting & alms doth deliver from sin / & therefore calleth them new teachers / that shut out the merit of fasting. Which I therefore recite / because you would seem by Aug. & Ambrose judgements / to allow of the weekly and commanded fasts. What you mean to cite this place ad Januarium. 118. I can not tell / you charge the authors of the admonition to be conspired with the papists / I will not charge you so / but will think better of you / until the contrary do more appear. But I appeal to the judgement of all men / if this be not to bring in popery again / to allow of s. Aug. saying / wherein he saith that the celebrating of the day of the passion. &c. is either of some general council / or of the Apostles commanded & decreed / whereby a gate is open unto the papists to bring in / under the colour of traditions / all their beggary whatsoever. For you plainly confirm / that there is some thing necessary to be observed / which is not contained any ways in the scripture. For to keep those holy days / is not contained in the scripture / neither can be ⟨p. 31⟩concluded of any part thereof / and yet they are necessary to be kept / if they be commanded of the Apostles.