A18080:112
The second reply of Thomas CartwrightThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright
The second reply of Thomas Cartwright: against Master Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Church disciplineThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright: agaynst Maister Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Churche discipline
Heidelberg: printed by Michael Schirat, 1575
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
To the next sect. pag. 28.
IF this sentence (he that is a good and a modest preacher will not disdain as well to be taught as teach) be not an idle vagabond / and broken loose from all his follows: then it must needs be a reason off that wherein you said before / that you knew no man so well learned, but it might become him to read and learn Master Nowell's Catechism and the Argument is as I have gathered it. For you to prove that it becometh the authors off the admonition to learn that Catechism / add that the place off Timothy / doth not forbid to learn. And again a Modest preacher will not disdain to be taught. So that this is your argument / A modest preacher must be taught / therefore he must learn that Catechism / and therefore must be enjoined to learn it. And if you say that you set it down to show / that no man is so well learned but he may learn still / or to show that the place off Saint Paul doth not forbid to learn: I ask to what purpose? Considering that the authors off the admonition / do not deny that a Minister ought to learn: but that it is unmeet for a Minister to be enjoined to learn Catechisms. And as for all the arguments which the D. gathereth himself out off this place / they are so many witnesses against him / that he fought with his own shadow. For where he still concludeth they may read Catechisms / he concludeth that which the admonition denieth not: but that which the admonition denieth to be meet / (which is to drive a minister to learn Catechisms) he never concludeth. It shall be therefore at your own choice / whether you will have that your argument that I have framed / or else that you have not spoken to the matter.
IFF this sentence (he that is a good and a modest preacher will not disdaine as well to be taught as teach) be not an idle vagabonde / and broken loose from all his followes: then it must needes be a reason off that wherin yow said before / that yow knew no man so well learned, but yt might become him to reade and learne Maister Nowellles Cathechisme and the Argument is as I haue gathered it. For yow to proue that yt becommeth the authors off the admonition to learne that Cathechisme / adde that the place off Timothie / dothe not forbidd to learne. And againe a Modest preacher will not disdaine to be taught. So that this is your argument / A modest preacher must be taught / therfore he must learne that Cathechisme / and therfore must be enioyned to learne yt. And iff yow saie that yow set yt downe to shew / that no man is so well learned but he may learne still / or to shew that the place off Saint Paule dothe not forbidd to learne: I aske to what purpose? Considering that the authors off the admonition / do not denie that a Minister owght to learne: but that yt is vnmeete for a Mynister to be enioyned to learne Cathechismes. And as for all the argumentes which the D. gatherethe himselfe owt off this place / they are so manie witnesses against him / that he fowght with his owne shadowe. For where he still concludethe they may reade Cathechismes / he concludeth that whiche the admonition denieth not: but that whiche the admonition denieth to be meete / (which is to driue a minister to learne Cathechismes) he neuer concludeth. Yt shalbe therfore at your owne choise / whether yow will haue that your argument that I haue framed / or els that yow haue not spoken to the matter.