A18080:125
The second reply of Thomas CartwrightThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright
The second reply of Thomas Cartwright: against Master Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Church disciplineThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright: agaynst Maister Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Churche discipline
Heidelberg: printed by Michael Schirat, 1575
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Unto the next sect. pag. 33.
Vnto the next sect. pag. 33.
Leaving his untrue accusations / I answer / that where he saith that the case off Luther and Zuinglius off Circumcision and preaching unto gentiles / which I alleged are not like / for that they be substantial points of religion / and these be not: it is his old cuckoo's song. For we offer to prove this also off the substance off Religion. And I brought the examples only to show / that to be untrue which he goeth about to persuade / that all those which contend where the gospel is preached / are to be holden for disturbers. The other difference which he placeth in that Luther and Zuinglius did that which they did in striving about the Sacrament / by consent off their several magistrates: although he doth not make that appear: yet I ask him what Zuinglius / &c. should have done / if the Magistrate would not have suffered him to answer: should he have suffered the truth to be destitute off his defence? Where he citeth out off Zuinglius that the gospel is a sword to divide the faithful, and therefore that this doctrine which hath made a division in the church can not be good: I answer that although he might well say it to the Anabaptists / and that it so cometh to pass for the most part: yet that can be no general rule / considering that the preaching that circumcision was not necessary / although it divided those off the church which believed it from those that did not believe it:: yet those which did not believe it / did not there fore cease to be off the church / and off the number off the faithful.
LEauing his vntrue accusations / I answere / that where he saithe that the case off Luther and Zuinglius off Circumcision and preaching vnto gentilles / which I alledged are not like / for that they be substantiall pointes of religion / and these be not: it is his oulde cuckoes songe. For we offer to proue this also off the substance off Religion. And I browght the examples onely to shew / that to be vntrue which he goethe abowt to perswade / that all those which contende where the gospell is preached / are to be holden for disturbers. Thother difference which he placeth in that Luther and Zuinglius did that which they did in strininge abowt the Sacramēt / by consent off theire seuerall magistrates: althoughe he dothe not make that appeare: yet I aske him what Zuinglius / &c. should haue done / iff the Magistrate would not haue suffred him to answere: should he haue suffred the truthe to be destitute off his defence? Where he citeth owt off Zuinglius that the gospell is a sworde to deuide the faithfull, and therfore that this doctrine which hathe made a diuision in the church can not be good: I answere that althoughe he might well saye it to the Anabaptistes / and that yt so comethe to passe for the most parte: yet that can be no generall rule / consideringe that the preaching that circumcision was not necessarie / although it deuided those off the church which beleued it from those that did not beleue it:: yet those which did not beleue it / did not ther fore cease to be off the churche / and off the numbre off the faithfull.