A18080:1165
The second reply of Thomas CartwrightThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright
The second reply of Thomas Cartwright: against Master Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Church disciplineThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright: agaynst Maister Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Churche discipline
Heidelberg: printed by Michael Schirat, 1575
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
That the pressing off the example off the high priest amongest the Jews, draweth a Pope: I leave to be considered off that before written: especially seeing the high priest was not only governor off the Jews / when they were pa•ed in the land 1off Canaan: but even then also when (as it is known) they were scattered through out all nations in the world. For as S. Luke saith it to have been / immediately after the ascension off our Sau. Christ: so was it many years before his coming into the world. So that he which will frame an Archbishop by that example / establisheth the Ecclesiastical charge off one / over those which were scattered throughout all the corners off the earth. It would be also observed / how here the D playeth on both hands. For when we reason sometime only off the proportion off the law to the gospel / other sometime off the perpetual law off God: we receive answer that we are Jewish enemies to the liberty of the church. But where there is any thing under the law / coming within a furlong off his cause: he gripeth it for gospellike / and which ought to be followed. I see / that M. Nowel thinketh a Metro poltane may be over a Christian province, as the high priest was over the Jews: wherein / I can be but sorry that all the Godly learned / are not off one mind. As for Hyperius, he seemeth to reason upon a supposition: that if the example off the government off the high priest under the law should be followed (which he before denied): that then a man might conclude an Archbishop over a Province / but not a Pope over the whole church. This to be his meaning I think the D. him self will accord me: else let him tell me what to 2answer to him / that saith: that it is not red in the scripture / that ever any off the Apostles / toke unto him self authority or primacy over the other Apostles / but that a most perfect equality is showed to have been in all: that Christ did prescribe them equal offices in all things: that that manner of dominion which was not in the apostles 3time ought not to have been admitted in the ages which followed. Likewise what he will answer to him / which condemneth as new found orders Archdeacons Archelders and vicars. Whereof the 2. first have (as I have showed) better testimony of ⟨p. DCXXXVII⟩