A18080:586
The second reply of Thomas CartwrightThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright
The second reply of Thomas Cartwright: against Master Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Church disciplineThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright: agaynst Maister Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Churche discipline
Heidelberg: printed by Michael Schirat, 1575
Title page typeset from the transcription.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
After many vain words against the reply unto the places ⟨p. CCLXIX⟩off Timothy / as that it is against the authority off learned writers, against the whole course off the Epistle, against the circumstance off the place: he allegeth that the most off the precepts contained in that epistle, do properly pertain unto Timothy, as he is a bishop. Which is untrue / especially in that sense he taketh a bishop / which the Apostles never knew off: for there shall be scarce two sentences found in the whole epistle / which agree not to every pastor. And set aside those which concern teaching / there are very few not common with him / unto an elder which only governeth. Beside divers belonging unto the whole church / as well as unto him: and some rather to other parts off the church / then unto him, yet if the most should properly belong unto him: how can he prove that the sentence off not laying one off hands rashly / doth only belong unto him? he hath cited many to prove that Saint Paul saith / it doth belong unto the bishop, which is not denied: but that it doth only belong by this place off Saint Paul / which is denied / he hath not one. Nay divers off his authors here alleged / have the contrary off that he pretendeth to prove by them. For Bull. I have said. Calu. denying that ether Paul / or Timothy did any thing in elections / without the consent off the church / touching the bare ceremony off laying on the hands / he doubteth whether it were done by one / or many. And Jerome although he say / that the ordination belonged to the bishop yet I have showed in the former book / that he confesseth that that was by no order of God / or rule of the Apostles (by which he confesseth that the bishops were equal unto the rest of the elders) but only by constitution off men. Therefore he is untruly cited / to confirm that by this place off the Apostle / the bishop hath ether the election / or ordination unto him self.
After many vaine wordes againste the replie vnto the places ⟨p. CCLXIX⟩off Timothe / as that it is against thauthoritie off learned writers, against the whole course off the Epistell, againste the circunstance off the place: he alledgeth that the moste off the preceptes conteined in that epistell, doo properly perteine vnto Timothe, as he is a bishop. Which is vntrwe / especially in that sense he taketh a bishop / which the Apostels neuer knewe off: for there shalbe scarse two sentences found in the whole epistle / which agree not to euery pastor. And set aside those whiche cōcerne teachinge / there are very fewe not commen with him / vnto an elder which onely gouerneth. Beside diuers belonging vnto the whole church / as well as vnto him: and some rather to other partes off the church / then vnto him, yet iff the moste shoulde properly belonge vnto him: howe can he proue that the sentence off not layinge one off handes rashly / doth onele belonge vnto him? he hath cyted many to proue that Saint Paule saith / yt doth belonge vnto the bishop, which is not denied: but that yt doth onely belonge by this place off Saint Paule / which is denied / he hath not one. Nay diuers off his authors heere alledged / haue the contrarie off that he pretendeth to proue by them. For Bull. I haue saide. Calu. denyinge that ether Paule / or Timothe did any thinge in elections / withowt the consent off the church / towching the bare ceremonie off layinge on the handes / he dowteth whether yt were doone by one / or many. And Ierome althowgh he saie / that the ordinacion belonged to the bishop yet I haue shewed in the former booke / that he cōfesseth that that was by no order of God / or rule of the Apostles (by which he confesseth that the bishopps were equall vnto the reste of the elders) but onely by constitutiō off men. Therfore he is vntrwely cited / to confirme that by this place off the Apostell / the bishoppe hath ether the election / or ordination vnto him selffe.