A18080:777
The second reply of Thomas CartwrightThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright
The second reply of Thomas Cartwright: against Master Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Church disciplineThe second replie of Thomas Cartwright: agaynst Maister Doctor Whitgiftes second answer, touching the Churche discipline
Heidelberg: printed by Michael Schirat, 1575
Title page typeset from the transcription.
The 5. Tract. and 6. un the O.The 5. Tract. and 6. vn the O.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Where he saith preaching is more apt for the ignorant, and unlearned, and that he denieth not this: the untruth thereof is apparent. For if preaching be more profitable to the unlearned then reading / and de at least as profitable to the learned: then it is false that he hath set down with so great assurance / that reading is as effectual as preaching: seeing the effect we speak off / is the profit off the hearers. Yet as a man strawght off his wits striketh him self: he overthroweth this also in an other place. for in asking why Josia caused the law to be red▪ except it had as great force to 1persuade red as preached: he signifieth the contrary off that here affirmed. Considering that the greatest part was off the common people / and that gross: as those which newly came out off filthy idolatry. Further if preaching were as meet for the learned / and meeter for the rude: then his reason there / which imagineth that Josia would not otherwise have caused the law to be red / onles there had been as great fruit in reading as preaching / falleth flat. Considering that the D. confesseth / that preaching is more effectual to the people: and I think dare not deny / but it is as effectual to the learned. Therefore the reason why Josiah caused the law to be red / was not because reading was as effectual as preaching: but because being both red and preached / it profiteth more then when it is simply red.
Where he saith preaching is more apt for the ignorant, and vnlearned, and that he denieth not this: the vntruth theroff is apparant. For if preaching be more profitable to the vnlearned then reading / and de at least as profitable to the learned: then yt is false that he hath set downe with so great assurance / that reading is as effectuall as preaching: seing the effect we speake off / is the profit off the hearers. Yet as a man strawght off his wittes striketh him selfe: he ouerthroweth this also in an other place. for in asking why Iosia caused the lawe to be redd▪ except it had as great force to 1perswade redd as preached: he signifieth the contrary off that heere affirmed. Considering that the greatest part was off the commen people / and that grosse: as those which newly came owt off filthy idolatry. Further if preaching were as meet for the learned / and meeter for the rude: then his reason there / which imagineth that Iosia would not otherwise haue caused the law to be redd / onles there had bene as great fruict in reading as preaching / falleth flat. Considering that the D. confesseth / that preaching is more effectuall to the people: and I thincke dare not deny / but it is as effectuall to the learned. Therfore the reason why Iosias cawsed the law to be redd / was not becawse reading was as effectuall as preaching: but because being both redd and preached / yt profiteth more then when yt is symply redd.