A19142:548
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
4. The Repl. said that Ceremonial is sometime opposed to moral, and sometime to Substantial, but not to Doctrinal. Hereupon the Rej. concludeth, that therefore, the distinction of Doctrinal and Ceremonial Ceremonies may be allowed, because (forsooth) as there be some moral Ceremonies, viz. all those which are appointed of God, and some other, so there be some Ceremonial doctrines, or doctrinal Ceremonies, and some other.
4. The Repl. sayd that Ceremoniall is sometime opposed to morall, and sometime to Substantiall, but not to Doctrinall. Heerupon the Rej. concludeth, that therfore, the distinction of Doctrinall and Ceremoniall Ceremonies may be allowed, because (forsooth) as there be some morall Ceremonies, viz. all those which are appointed of God, and some other, so there bee some Ceremoniall doctrines, or doctrinall Ceremonies, and some other.
Where 1. the consequence is such as the former: Sometime Ceremonial is opposed to moral, and substantial: ergo some Ceremonies are doctrinal, and some only Ceremonial. 2. What a miscarrying is there in that assertion, all Ceremonies appointed of God are moral? Was there then no difference betwixt the moral and Ceremonial law of God. 3. There neither be, nor can be such significant teaching Ceremonies, as ours in question, and not be Ceremonial teachings, or tea••ing Ceremonies: which is all one with Ceremonial doctrines, or doctrinal Ceremonies.
Where 1. the consequence is suche as the former: Sometime Ceremoniall is opposed to morall, and substantiall: ergo some Ceremonies are doctrinall, and some onely Ceremoniall. 2. What a miscarying is ther in that assertion, all Ceremonies appointed of God are morall? Was there then no difference betwixt the morall and Ceremoniall law of God. 3. Ther neyther bee, nor can be suche significant teaching Ceremonies, as ours in q••estion, and not be Ceremoniall teachings, or tea••ing Ceremonies: which is all one with Ceremoniall •otrines, or doctrinall Ceremonies.