A19142:680
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…
A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgess his rejoinder for D. Morton The first partA fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D. Burgesse his rejoinder for D. Morton The first part
Amsterdam: printed by the successors of Giles Thorp, 1633
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
But that speaking in unknown tongues which the Rej. doeth refer to edification as distinct from order and decency, is by good Divines accounted to offend against the order and decency, spoken of c. •4. and 40. So D. Whitaker, de Script. q. 2. c. 18. disputeth against the use of an unknown tongue in Gods service, out of this very place: pugnat hoc vero cum [Greek or Hebrew] quam maxime. 1. Cor. 14.40. 1. e. this mightily overthrows that good order which he so much stands for. His 3. is, the Defend doeth no way seem to grant the proposition: because the Repl. undertaketh by argument to rescue this place out of the Def. his hands.
But that speaking in unknowē tongues which the Rej. doeth referre to edification as distinct from order and decencie, is by good Divines accounted to offende against the order and decencie, spoken of c. •4. and 40. So D. Whitaker, de Script. q. 2. c. 18. disputeth against the use of an unknowen tongue in Gods service, out of this very place: pugnat hoc vero cum 〈non-Latin alphabet〉 quam maxime. 1. Cor. 14.40. 1. e. this mightly overthrowes that good order which he so much stands for. His 3. is, the Defend doeth no way seeme to grant the proposition: because the Repl. undertaketh by argument to rescue this place out of the Def. his hands.
But this nothing at all argueth, that the Def. and the Repl. do not agree about the proposition, though they dissent about the place, as it is handled in the assumption. The Papists grant us, this proposition: No phrase is used by Christ, in those words: this is my body, but a Sacramental one. Yet because they deny the assumption: transubstantiating words, are not a Sacramental phrase, we undertake by argument to rescue this place out of their hands. So the Def. requiring no more, then order and Decency unto Edification, to be left unto the Churches liberty, for the establishing of our Ceremonies, doeth seem at least to grant, that all which is left to the Churches liberty is order and Decency unto edification, though he deny these to contain no more then mere circumstances, which is the assumption. Of Edification there is not mention made in the proposition, because that as an end, is out of question, and always included.