A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's worship. Or a triplication unto. D.…A fresh suit against human ceremonies in God's vvorship. Or a triplication unto. D.…

As for a patent to appoint double, treble, sacred Ceremonies, it is a vain thing for them to plead it, that cannot show it under the great Seal. I do not think, that any earthly King would have his subjects submit them selves to that power, which is fetched out of a Patent, invisible, and only avouched by conjectures.

As for a patent to appoint double, treble, sacred Ceremonies, it is a vayn thing for them to plead it, that cannot shew it under the great Seal. I doe not thinke, that any earthly Kinge would have his subjects submit thē selves to that power, which is fetched out of a Patent, invisible, and onely avouched by conjectures.

7. A reason was given of the foresaid proposition, out of Jun. de Transl. Imp. l. 1. c. 2. n. 26.27.31. viz. that the Church hath only a Ministry, to observe such things as Christ hath appointed, not authority of appointing new things. Here the Rejoinder 1. observeth, that those words, (new things) have no foot steps in Junius. As if new things could be appointed lawfully without authority of appointing. Surely, he that denieth all authority of appointing, and leaveth only ministerial performance of things appointed, he denieth appointing of new things. 2. He argueth thus: If the Church have a ministry to appoint and do such things as Christ hath commanded, then must she needs have a Commission legative to appoint and use rites serving to order and decency. Add to this only, and then it is not only that, but all that which we require. 3. He crieth out of miserable perversion, either by gross negligence, or mistaking.

7. A reason was given of the foresaid proposition, out of Iun. de Transl. Imp. l. 1. c. 2. n. 26.27.31. viz. that the Churche hath onely a Ministerie, to observe suche thinges as Christ hath appointed, not authoritie of appointing new thinges. Here the Rejoynder 1. observeth, that those words, (new things) have no foot steps in Iunius. As if new things could be appointed lawfully without authoritie of appointing. Surely, he that denieth all authoritie of appointing, and leaveth onely ministeriall performance of things appointed, he denieth appointing of new thinges. 2. He argueth thus: If the Churche have a ministerie to appoint and doe suche thinges as Christ hath commanded, then must she needs have a Commission legative to appoint and use rites serving to order and decencie. Adde to this onely, and then it is not onely that, but all that which we require. 3. He crieth out of miserable perversion, eyther by grosse negligence, or mistaking.