A26864:334
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression…
Rich. Baxters apology against the modest exceptions of Mr. T. Blake and the digression of Mr. G. Kendall whereunto is added animadversions on a late dissertation of Ludiomæus Colvinus, aliaà Ludovicus Molinæs̳, M. Dr. Oxon, and an admonition of Mr. W. Eyre of Salisbury : with Mr. Crandon's Anatomy for satisfaction of Mr. Caryl.
London: printed by A.M. for Thomas Underhill, 1654
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
§. 34.
Mr Bl. The perfection of this holiness and righteousness in mans integrity, stood in the perfect conformity to this Law; and the reparation of this in our regenerate estate (in which the Apostle placeth the Image of God) must have reference as to God for a pattern, so to his Law as a Rule.
Mr Bl. THe perfection of this holiness and righteousness in mans integrity, stood in the perfect conformity to this Law; and the reparation of this in our regenerate estate (in which the Apostle placeth the Image of God) must have reference as to God for a pattern, so to his Law as a Rule.
§. 34.
R.B. 1. IT was the very transcendental perfection which is convertible with its being (as to Righteousness) which then stood in a perfect conformity to the Law. Adam after his first sin, was not only less righteous, but reus mortis, condemnandus, and not righteous in sensu forensi according to that Law For I hope you observe that we speak not of that called Moral Righteousness, consisting in a habit of giving every man his own: but of Justitia forensis.