A30249:774
Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the moral law and the covenants, from the…Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the morall law and the covenants, from the…
Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the moral law and the covenants, from the errors of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians in XXX lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London / by Anthony Burgess ...Vindiciae legis, or, A vindication of the morall law and the covenants, from the errours of Papists, Arminians, Socinians, and more especially, Antinomians in XXX lectures, preached at Laurence-Jury, London / by Anthony Burgess ...
London: printed by James Young for Thomas Underhill, 1647
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
C. A Cordial for a broken heart. p. 22. 23 Contradictions of the Antinomians. p. 31 A Community of goods not taught by the law of Nature. p. 83 Christs Incarnation cannot be supposed, but upon supposition of Adams fall. p. 135 It is an hard matter so to set up Christ and grace as not thereby to destroy the law. p. 210 The doctrine of Christ and grace in the highest manner doth establish not overthrow the law. p. 211 God entered into Covenant with Adam, in giving him a law. p. 122. 123 What a Covenant implies. p. 124 Why the Covenant of grace is not still a covenant of works, seeing works are necessary. p. 48 A Covenant of Friendship. Reconciliation. p. 124 No Covenant properly so called can be betwixt God and Man. p. 126 How God can covenant with man. ibid. Five Reasons why God would deal with man in a covenant-way, rather then in an absolute way. p. 127. 128 A vast difference betwixt the covenant in innocency and in grace. p. 129. 130 The moral law delivered as a covenant, proved. p. 230 It hath the real properties of a covenant ib. In what sense the law may be a covenant of grace, explained. p. 232. 233 Arguments proving the law a covenant of grace. p. 234. 235. 236 Objections answered. p. 237 Doctor Crisp confuted. p. 15 ⟨image 149⟩Cursing taken two ways: 1 Potentially, so a law is always condemning. 2. Actually, so a law is not ever condemning. p. 6
C. A Cordiall for a broken heart. p. 22. 23 Contradictions of the Antinomians. p. 31 A Community of goods not taught by the law of Nature. p. 83 Christs Incarnation cannot be supposed, but upon supposition of Adams fall. p. 135 It is an hard matter so to set up Christ and grace as not thereby to destroy the law. p. 210 The doctrine of Christ and grace in the highest manner doth establish not overthrow the law. p. 211 God entred into Covenant with Adam, in giving him a law. p. 122. 123 What a Covenant implyes. p. 124 Why the Covenant of grace is not still a covenant of works, seeing works are necessary. p. 48 A Covenant of Friendship. Reconciliation. p. 124 No Covenant properly so called can be betwixt God and Man. p. 126 How God can covenant with man. ibid. Five Reasons why God would deal with man in a covenant-way, rather then in an absolute way. p. 127. 128 A vast difference betwixt the covenant in innocency and in grace. p. 129. 130 The morall law delivered as a covenant, proved. p. 230 It hath the reall properties of a covenant ib. In what sense the law may be a covenant of grace, explained. p. 232. 233 Arguments proving the law a covenant of grace. p. 234. 235. 236 Objections answered. p. 237 Doctor Crisp confuted. p. 15