A42757:960
Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present…
Aaron's rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversy concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiastical government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlessness of the chief objections made against the Presbyterial government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...Aarons rod blossoming, or, The divine ordinance of church-government vindicated so as the present Erastian controversie concerning the distinction of civill and ecclesiasticall government, excommunication, and suspension, is fully debated and discussed, from the holy scripture, from the Jewish and Christian antiquities, from the consent of latter writers, from the true nature and rights of magistracy, and from the groundlesnesse of the chief objections made against the Presbyteriall government in point of a domineering arbitrary unlimited power / by George Gillespie ...
London: printed by E.G. for Richard Whitaker, 1646
Book 3 › Chapter 8: Whether Judas received the Sacrament of the Lords Supper.
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
but yet patience must not be so far void of discerning, as that they should give the most sacred mysteries of Christ, to unworthy persons whom they know to be such.
but yet patience must not be so farre void of discerning, as that they should give the most sacred mysteries of Christ, to unworthy persons whom they know to be such.
As for modern writers, this present question hath been debated by Salmeron Tom. 9. Tract. 11. and by Dr Kellet in his Tricaenium lib. 2. cap. 14. both of them hold that Judas did not receive the Lords Supper. Mariana on Luke 22. 21. citeth authors for both opinions, and rejecteth neither. Gerhard Harm. Evang. cap. 171, citeth for the same opinion, that Judas did not receive the Lords Supper, (beside Salmeron) Turrianus and Barradius: and of ours Danaeus, Musculus, Kleinwitzius, Piscator, & alii complures, saith he, and many others.
As for moderne writers, this present question hath been debated by Salmeron Tom. 9. Tract. 11. and by Dr Kellet in his Tricaenium lib. 2. cap. 14. both of them hold that Iudas did not receive the Lords Supper. Mariana on Luke 22. 21. citeth authors for both opinions, and rejecteth neither. Gerhard Harm. Evang. cap. 171, citeth for the same opinion, that Iudas did not receive the Lords Supper, (beside Salmeron) Turrianus and Barradius: and of ours Danaeus, Musculus, Kleinwitzius, Piscator, & alii complures, saith he, and many others.