A64002:335
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute…The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute…
The riches of Gods love unto the vessels of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessels of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entitled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two books, the first being a refutation of the said book, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hord's discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceals his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twice ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twice from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeans ...The riches of Gods love unto the vessells of mercy, consistent with his absolute hatred or reprobation of the vessells of wrath, or, An answer unto a book entituled, Gods love unto mankind ... in two bookes, the first being a refutation of the said booke, as it was presented in manuscript by Mr Hord unto Sir Nath. Rich., the second being an examination of certain passages inserted into M. Hords discourse (formerly answered) by an author that conceales his name, but was supposed to be Mr Mason ... / by ... William Twisse ... ; whereunto are annexed two tractates of the same author in answer unto D.H. ... ; together with a vindication of D. Twisse from the exceptions of Mr John Goodwin in his Redemption redeemed, by Henry Jeanes ...
Oxford: printed by L.L. and H.H. for Tho. Robinson, 1653
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
Neutiquam tamen ullus ob id existimet ab utroque Concilio approbatos tres libros Fausti de Gratiâ, ut ipse mendaciter innuere videtur in ea quae his subjicitur, praefatoriâ Epistolâ ad Episcopum Leontinum &c. But can Vossius show that Maxentius did cast this juggling course of Faustus in his teeth?
Neutiquam tamen ullus ob id existimet ab utroque Concilio approbatos tres libros Fausti de Gratiâ, ut ipse mendaciter innuere videtur in ea quae his subjicitur, praefatoriâ Epistolâ ad Episcopum Leontinum &c. But can Vossius shew that Maxentius did cast this jugling course of Faustus in his teeth?
But it seems that Vossius had no great need to trouble himself in the vindicating of Faustus his reputation in pretending the subscription of Bishops to his Epistle written to Lucidus. For how doth it appear that Faustus is the author of any such pretence? It is true, in the Epistle it self that he wrote to Lucidus, he professeth that he kept a copy of it, to show to that assembly of Bishops, Hujus Epistolae exemplar mecum retineo in conventu Sanctorum Antistitum, si ita necesse fuerit, proferendum: by the way observe that this resolution of his, was not absolute, but si ita necesse fuerit, and this necessity he signifies wherein it did consist, namely in case Lucidus by his silence, did give testimony of his continuance in his error, as he calls it, His words are these, Quod si eam subscriptam transmitter nolueris, aperte adhuc te in error persistere ipso silentio comprobabis, ac perinde jam necessitatem mihi facies ad personam tuam publicis conventibus exponendam. Now as for that which follows after the end of the Epistle, Et subscripserunt Episcopi, qui ordine subsequuntur qui in eâ quoque Synodo adfuerunt.
But it seems that Vossius had no great need to trouble himselfe in the vindicating of Faustus his reputation in pretending the subscription of Bishops to his Epistle written to Lucidus. For how doth it appeare that Faustus is the author of any such pretence? It is true, in the Epistle it selfe that he wrote to Lucidus, he professeth that he kept a copy of it, to shew to that assembly of Bishops, Hujus Epistolae exemplar mecum retineo in conventu Sanctorum Antistitum, si ita necesse fuerit, proferendum: by the way observe that this resolution of his, was not absolute, but si ita necesse fuerit, and this necessity he signifies wherein it did consist, namely in case Lucidus by his silence, did give testimony of his continuance in his errour, as he calls it, His words are these, Quod si eam subscriptam transmittere nolueris, aperte adhuc te in errore persistere ipso silentio comprobabis, ac perinde iam necessitatem mihi facies ad personam tuam publicis conventibus exponendam. Now as for that which followes after the end of the Epistle, Et subscripserunt Episcopi, qui ordine subsequuntur qui in eâ quoque Synodo adfuerunt.