A64611:1278
The sum of Christian religion, delivered by Zacharias Ursinus first, by way of catechism,…The summe of Christian religion, delivered by Zacharias Ursinus first, by way of catechism,…
The sum of Christian religion, delivered by Zacharias Ursinus first, by way of catechism, and then afterwards more enlarged by a sound and judicious exposition, and application of the same : wherein also are debated and resolved the questions of whatsoever points of moment have been, or are controversed in divinity / first Englished by D. Henry Parry, and now again conferred with the best and last Latin edition of D. David Pareus, sometimes Professor of Divinity in Heidelberg ; whereunto is added a large and full alphabetical table of such matters as are therein contained ; together with all the Scriptures that are occasionally handled, by way either of controversy, exposition, or reconciliation, neither of which was done before, but now is performed for the readers delight and benefit ; to this work of Ursinus are now at last annexed the Theological miscellanies of D. David Pareus in which the orthodoxall tenets are briefly and solidly confirmed, and the contrary errors of the Papists, Ubiquitaries, Antitrinitaries, Eutychians, Socinians, and Arminians fully refuted ; and now translated into English out of the original Latin copy by A.R.The summe of Christian religion, delivered by Zacharias Ursinus first, by way of catechism, and then afterwards more enlarged by a sound and judicious exposition, and application of the same : wherein also are debated and resolved the questions of whatsoever points of moment have been, or are controversed in divinitie / first Englished by D. Henry Parry, and now again conferred with the best and last Latine edition of D. David Pareus, sometimes Professour of Divinity in Heidelberge ; whereunto is added a large and full alphabeticall table of such matters as are therein contained ; together with all the Scriptures that are occasionally handled, by way either of controversie, exposition, or reconciliation, neither of which was done before, but now is performed for the readers delight and benefit ; to this work of Ursinus are now at last annexed the Theologicall miscellanies of D. David Pareus in which the orthodoxall tenets are briefly and solidly confirmed, and the contrary errours of the Papists, Ubiquitaries, Antitrinitaries, Eutychians, Socinians, and Arminians fully refuted ; and now translated into English out of the originall Latine copie by A.R.
London: printed by James Young, 1645
Title page: Internet Archive scan of the Early English Books microfilm
Modern spelling is a reading aid: the words are the author’s, only the spelling is modernized. Original shows the page as printed, with the transcription marks.
As of the ⟨p. 293⟩God-head (which is the abstract name) no property of the man-hood may be affirmed, but only the properties of the God-head; because the God-head signifieth not the person which hath both names, but only the divine nature it self. But of God (which is the concrete name) the properties not of the God-head only, but of the man-hood also may be affirmed: because God signifieth not the divine nature, but the person which hath both the divine nature, and the humane.
As of the ⟨p. 293⟩God-head (which is the abstract name) no property of the man-hood may be affirmed, but only the properties of the God-head; because the God-head signifieth not the person which hath both names, but only the divine nature it selfe. But of God (which is the concrete name) the properties not of the God-head only, but of the man-hood also may be affirmed: because God signifieth not the divine nature, but the person which hath both the divine nature, and the humane.
Object. 3. There is no proportion between temporal punishment and eternal. Christ suffered only temporal pains and punishments: therefore he could not satisfy for eternal punishment. Answ. There is no proportion between temporal and eternal punishment, if they be considered as being both in the same subject: but in diverse subjects there may be. The temporal punishment of the Son of God is of more value and worth, than the eternal punishment of the whole world, for divers causes heretofore alleged.
Object. 3. There is no proportion between temporall punishment and eternall. Christ suffered onely temporall paines and punishments: therefore he could not satisfie for eternall punishment. Answ. There is no proportion between temporall and eternall punishment, if they be considered as being both in the same subject: but in diverse subjects there may be. The temporall punishment of the Son of God is of more value and worth, than the eternall punishment of the whole world, for divers causes heretofore alledged.